Phil Hardwick’s Strategy Letter, January 2016
As I was planning and strategizing about the coming year I had the idea that perhaps I wanted to set a goal of being the best professional development trainer in the state. That’s because one of the things I’m doing more of is training for various state agencies, school districts, nonprofits and businesses.
Right in the middle of my processing this idea and how I would measure such a goal I interrupted my thoughts by opening my weekly email Star Thrower Clip of the Week. After watching it, I began thinking of my goals and strategies in a different way. The presenter suggested that instead of thinking about Being the best IN the world versus being the best FOR the world. Hmm. So instead of being the best professional development trainer in Mississippi I should be the best professional development trainer FOR Mississippi.
Imagine what would happen, especially in the world of politics for example, if our elected officials changed their thinking like that. Instead of your statewide official striving not to be the best elected official in the state, but being the best elected official for the state. And what if your member of Congress – oh heck, I won’t even go there.
Carry this thought over to business and community leaders – or anybody for that matter. What if your goal was to be the best __________ (fill in the blank) FOR the state rather than being the best in the state? I think it would make a difference. Indeed, I suspect it would change a lot of strategies.
And this does not apply just to the state. What if you were the best person for your organization?
The video clip mentioned above is only five minutes. It opens with a famous photographer discussing this idea and then introduces us to a lady in Scotland. That’s enough of a teaser. Here’s the link: